Dr. Émile P. Torres : Twitter

Total Responses:1
Average Quality Score:70.0
Average Bias Score:5.0
2024-08-1702040608002468705
  • Quality Score
  • Bias Score
100%
  • Left
  • Center-Left
  • Center
  • Center-Right
  • Right
Alright kiddo, let's talk about what's happening here in a simple way!

There are some grown-ups talking online, like in a big chat. One person, let’s call him Dr. Émile, says he hasn’t seen something called "LLMs" thinking for themselves. He’s asking others if they have seen it.

Another person answers and says they can totally watch "LLMs" think in plain English, meaning in a way everyone can understand.

Then a quite famous cat (not a real one, just a picture of a cat) says it’s tricky to tell how people think compared to how these "LLMs" think.

A lady named Jackie simply says “Zero,” meaning she hasn’t seen these "LLMs" think for themselves either.

Finally, someone else (who we can call Rare Notion) says these "LLMs" are like having all the information in the world in a head, but not being able to think of anything new by themselves.

So, it’s like they’re all discussing whether something called "LLMs" can actually think on their own or not!
Generated
Holder
author:Dr. Émile P. Torresinstitution:Twitter¿porque no los dos?
tl;drDr. Émile P. Torres questions the capability of large language models (LLMs) to reason, referencing a contrary opinion. Other users express varying views on the LLMs' ability to reason, some agreeing with Torres while others disagree.
deeper:The tweet from Dr. Émile P. Torres presents a skepticism about LLMs' ability to reason. This skepticism is countered with a referenced tweet claiming LLMs can reason, allowing readers to see both viewpoints. The other user comments illustrate this debate without showing strong biases. The engagement levels suggest some interest but are not extremely high. While the topic is discussed with reasonable clarity, it lacks in-depth analysis or substantial evidence.
∨∨ more ∨∨