Alright kiddo, let's talk about what's happening here in a simple way!
There are some grown-ups talking online, like in a big chat. One person, letâs call him Dr. Ămile, says he hasnât seen something called "LLMs" thinking for themselves. Heâs asking others if they have seen it.
Another person answers and says they can totally watch "LLMs" think in plain English, meaning in a way everyone can understand.
Then a quite famous cat (not a real one, just a picture of a cat) says itâs tricky to tell how people think compared to how these "LLMs" think.
A lady named Jackie simply says âZero,â meaning she hasnât seen these "LLMs" think for themselves either.
Finally, someone else (who we can call Rare Notion) says these "LLMs" are like having all the information in the world in a head, but not being able to think of anything new by themselves.
So, itâs like theyâre all discussing whether something called "LLMs" can actually think on their own or not!
Dr. Ămile P. Torres questions the capability of large language models (LLMs) to reason, referencing a contrary opinion. Other users express varying views on the LLMs' ability to reason, some agreeing with Torres while others disagree.
deeper:
The tweet from Dr. Ămile P. Torres presents a skepticism about LLMs' ability to reason. This skepticism is countered with a referenced tweet claiming LLMs can reason, allowing readers to see both viewpoints. The other user comments illustrate this debate without showing strong biases. The engagement levels suggest some interest but are not extremely high. While the topic is discussed with reasonable clarity, it lacks in-depth analysis or substantial evidence.